Test Devices by SCHENCK Increases Testing Volume 50% and Cuts Administrative Work 79% with Tulip
A documented Quality Control & Inspection in Aerospace deployment at Test Devices by SCHENCK, with source-attributed results and missing evidence labelled explicitly.
Evidence at a glance
- Evidence status:
- Automated evidence gate passed
- Deployment timeframe:
- Not reported by source
- Reported outcome metrics:
- 3 cited below
- Directory entry published:
The source-link check confirms reachability, not independent re-verification of every claim.
Source-reported figures — cited source: tulip.co
The Challenge
Test Devices, a specialized aerospace spin testing and inspection firm, processed 10,000–12,000 high-value serialized parts annually using paper travelers. Each part worth $20,000–$80,000 required complete documentation for long-term traceability and AS9100 compliance. Growing volumes were straining the paper-based system and creating risk of procedural errors.
The Solution
Deployed Tulip to digitize paper travelers with barcode-driven routing that enforces step sequencing, embedded in-process measurements with automatic tolerance validation, computerized nonconformance workflows, and calibrated tool tracking. Deployed on AWS GovCloud for ITAR and FedRAMP compliance.
Results
Increased testing volume by 50%, from approximately 8,000 to 12,000 parts per year. Reduced administrative work tied to documentation by 79%. Improved audit readiness for AS9100 with instant digital record retrieval. Eliminated paper-related rework events.
Key Takeaways
For high-value serialized aerospace parts, the combination of step-enforced routing and automated tolerance validation directly prevents expensive scrap. The 79% administrative reduction enables volume scaling without headcount growth.
Explore Related
Vendor
Details
- Industry
- Aerospace
- Use Case
- Quality Control & Inspection
- AI Technology
- IoT & Sensors
- Company Size
- SME
- Company
- Test Devices by SCHENCK
- Evidence status
- Automated evidence gate passed
- Deployment timeframe
- Not reported by source
- Directory entry published
Cited source
tulip.coHave a similar implementation?
Share your customer's AI results and link it to your vendor profile.
Submit a case study →